US News & World Report B-School Rankings for 2007
US News & World Report has released its 2007 rankings of top business and graduate schools. As often happens, there was little change in the upper ranks of the top 50 b-schools. In the 'lower half' of the top 50, however, there were some interesting developments.
The top 20 or so slots of the USNWR rankings went to the usual honor roll: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Sloan, Kellogg, Chicago, Columbia, Haas, Tuck, and so on. These are the same schools that make the top part of anyone's list, year in and year out, and for good reason. They offer outstanding management education from exceptional faculty and introduce their students and graduates to vibrant networks of business leaders.
One of the reasons this 'short list' of top b-schools tends not to change much from year to year or from survey to survey is that it takes a considerable amount of time, money, and effort to organize the components that make a top school. It's hard to break in to the top ranks; it's hard to fall out of them, too.
That's less true of the somewhat lower ranks. That's where the most notable changes can be seen between last year's USNWR rankings and this year's.
Three schools that made USNWR's list of the top 50 b-schools last year did not make that same cut this year. They are the University of Iowa (Tippie), The University of Arizona (Eller), and Wake Forest University (Babcock).
In addition, several schools received significantly lower rankings this year than last year. The University of Washington went from 18 last year to 29 this year. Georgetown (McDonough) went from 27 to 34, and the University of Maryland (Smith) went from 27 to 38.
On the plus side, there were schools that rose significantly in this year's rankings. Michigan State (Broad) went from 32 last year to 23 this year. Washington University in St. Louis (Olin) went from 32 to 26. The University of Wisconsin-Madison went from 37 to 31, and Brigham Young University (Marriott) went from 40 to 34.
Three schools that were not ranked in the top 50 b-schools last year won places this year. They are Southern Methodist University (Cox), Boston College (Carroll), and the University of Pittsburg (Katz).
So what exactly does all this mean?
Overall, we're skeptical of every one of the half-dozen rankings systems in general use for business schools. We encourage our clients to be skeptical of them, too. USNWR's methodology is better than some, but even its findings depend on some highly objective input (peer assessment) and some factors that are subject to chance or to manipulation (how many alumni round up their starting salaries by how much).
As with many surveys and polls, changes in numbers over time tell us more than absolute figures do. The fact that Harvard is ranked number 1 and Stanford number 2 doesn't say much about how one school's program compares with the other. But the fact that the Olin School rose by 6 places from last year suggests that the school is at a minimum making a concerted effort to improve its image and attract more students. That's not a bad thing, from a prospective applicant's point of view.
The bottom line on rankings is that they can be a useful starting point for school selection but are a poor basis to make decisions about which schools to apply to.
To use the Harvard-Stanford example again, the USNWR rankings are accurate in tagging both of those schools as having some of the best MBA programs in the country. The rankings don't, however, explain how the schools are different from one another, or give information about why one school might be a better fit for you than the other. You'll have to dig deeper for that information. It's worth the effort to find it, too, because an articulate case for why you are particularly well suited to be a student at school X (laid out, of course, in your essays) is one of the biggest advantages you can bring to the competition for b-school admissions.